Chapter 9.                                          (continued) 

Cities and their ways proved fitter for economic progress than decentralized farm communities or nomadic tribes. More citizens working in increasingly specialized skilled tasks meant more and better goods and services available and thus, over time, helped to increase the population. Values shifted toward making all citizens comfortable while they functioned in densely populated neighborhoods, causing the rise of behaviors that encouraged citizens to respect their neighbors’ property. Don’t bear false witness against your neighbor and don’t covet the things he has in his yard next door. The Bible directed believers not to covet their neighbors’ goods because envy leads to friction and then violence.

A city’s laws expanded on the farmer’s rough guidelines for living in a thinly populated farming community of familiar faces. The laws prescribed more precisely what kinds of behaviors were acceptable in nearly all activities of city life. Urban crowding requires more civility. Even the word law came to be associated with reverent feelings (e.g., for Socrates⁷).

Most of all, the city had at its immediate beck and call large numbers who could fight off an enemy attack. Successful cities even progressed to the point where they could even afford to keep, feed, arm, and train full-time soldiers, professionals who were capable of outfighting almost any swarm of invading amateurs. The farmers remaining in the hinterland moved closer to the city because life was better there. Just one generation of life in or near the city taught citizens to be patriotic to their new state. Programming that survived made loyalty to one’s city-state automatic; patriotism is a virtue conducive to the city-state’s survival. Away from their city, morés, and values, people came to feel that there was no truly human life.

 

       

                                              Urn showing blacksmith at work in ancient Greece.

Literacy, metals, machines, and the technologies of industry, communications, and computers all brought values shifts to the nations in which they first arose. When the ways of life they fostered proved more vigorous than those of nearby competing societies, the values shifts, morés, and behavior patterns that rose up with the new technologies were eventually adopted by those other societies (usually with accompanying revolutions, nonviolent or violent). Of course, societies that resist these shifts in values and behaviors must find or create competing alternative behavior-generating programs within their own cultures, programs that are equally effective in the cultural-evolution game. Or they get overrun.