Aftermath of Battle of Gettysburg (1863) (credit: Henry William Elson, via Wikimedia Commons)
Which of the disasters above was natural and which was human-caused?
2. Establishing Foundational Terms
Let’s establish some basic terms. I will speak
of a moral code as a behavior code because in the end, that is
what a moral code does: it tells us how to behave. I will use the words tribe,
society, and nation as though they are interchangeable. For our
purposes here, they are. They all name groups of similarly programmed humans,
each member of the group sharing a set of memes that enables the group to act in
coordinated ways as a team.
Among animals, individual humans aren’t
impressive. We’re not fast or strong compared to other animals. We have puny
fangs and claws. But in teams, we’re the deadliest creatures on earth.
I will also speak in what follows as if
the mind, the capacity for reason, is a given for nearly all humans. A
concept that is near to irreducible. It is very difficult to further describe
or explain what a mind is in terms of simpler concepts.
Each of us has a capacity to sense details
in our physical surroundings (i.e. to see, hear, smell, etc.), then to spot
patterns in our sense data, then to compare them to memories of past sense data
and our responses to them, then to plan action to steer our bodies safely
through our environment, second by second. If we didn’t have this capacity, we’d
quickly get buried in landslides, drowned in rivers, eaten by predators, smashed
up on the roads, or destroyed by some other hazards too many to list and some
we can’t yet imagine.
Most of the time, disasters don’t happen
to us. Why? Because we carry code in our bodies (in our brains) that enables us
to spot patterns in sense data, act in ways that enable us to avoid oncoming, potentially
painful events, exploit useful ones, then save what we learn for future use. The
programming that enables us to recognize recurring patterns in physical reality
is the source of our complex capacity to form concepts, i.e. ways of
grouping sense data memories that look alike to us. (That’s what concepts are.)
We call this big program mind.
We’ve had much difficulty explaining in simpler
terms what a mind is, though science is getting closer to pinning it down. But
for now, roughly, it is software that stores, organizes, and processes sense-data.
It runs on extremely complex hardware: the brain. I am software (mind) running
on hardware (brain).
Mind is a crucial program found in all
living things; to varying degrees for each of them, it enables survival. The
degree of its power and importance for human survival is just higher than for
other species. We humans survive by our minds.
Every living thing has programming built
into its body that enables it to detect and handle the hazards and
opportunities in its reality. All living things can thus be said to have some
form of mind. With our complex brains we hold larger minds so we can store, update,
and use sense data memories and the concepts we have built with them to direct our
actions more efficiently than most other life forms do. Even as individuals, we
humans have higher level ‘executive apps’ that tell us when to open lower level
apps (concept sets) that tell us how to act.
Then, most importantly, we can save what
we learn and pass that programming on to our young. It is our complex human minds
that have made possible our not only developing effective programs for survival
in this universe but passing them on to our kids. This is our most powerful
trait. We teach our kids how to avoid our mistakes and remember and use our
successes, even over generations.
In short, it is mind that enables what we
call culture. And it is this capacity for learning, and passing on, a
culture that makes us fully human. I will define culture more thoroughly
below, but roughly it is all that we absorb as kids from other members of our
tribe, especially ones we call “family” or “teachers”.
Wildfire near Ashcroft, B.C., Canada (Aug., 2017)
(credit: Shawn Cahill, via Wikimedia Commons)
Searching for bodies in rubble in Gaza (2023)
(credit: Jaber Jehad Badwan)
By the way, I consider the harsh worldview
I take here that sees the universe as relentlessly dangerous and uncertain to
be obvious. This essay assumes readers know the universe is harsh. Like all
living things, we’re surrounded by objects and forces that would destroy us if
we didn’t detect them, then block, run, or hide from them, or fight back
against them.
The hazardousness of physical reality is pervasive; it’s fair to
say it is reality. If you think you’re navigating toward a secure future
situation in which you will be able to stop worrying, you should disabuse
yourself of that view as soon as can. That secure future does not
exist, never has existed, never will exist. We’ll discuss further the basic
destructiveness and uncertainty of the universe later in this essay.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.