Now let’s return to our main argument, in spite of
digressions that beckon.
It is clear that individual human behaviours and
the internal running of the more complex but vital values programs (which are
mental meta-behaviours) almost all originate in the socialization that the individual
is given by his or her society.
Furthermore, values become established in a
society when they direct its citizens toward patterns of behaviour that enable
the citizens to survive, reproduce, and territorialize with ever-growing
success.
By now some readers are probably inferring a
profound insight about the higher-order mental constructs that we call values. Clearly, the deepest principles that
must underlie and guide our value systems—in big choices for the tribe and
small ones for the individual—must be designed in such a way as to enable us to
respond effectively to the largest general principles of the physical universe
itself. That universe is the one in which survival happens or does not happen.
Value systems must have designs underlying them that complement and respond to
the designs inherent in matter, space, and time.
What are these principles? For impatient readers, I
can only say that I am coming to them—by small steps and gradual degrees. But
we have to discuss the network of ideas at the base of the new moral system
thoroughly before we try to build the middle and upper levels. Proceeding with
precision and care will maximize the chances of our seeing that a universal
moral code is possible for us to devise—in theory—and that such a code, if we
can implement it, will offer the only path into the future that enables the
survival of our species—in practice.
Notes
1. www.bbc.com/culture/story/20151012-feral-the-children-raised-by-wolves.
2. “Enculturation,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.
Accessed April 20, 2015. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enculturation.
3. “Sociocultural evolution,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed April 20, 2015. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociocultural_evolution#Contemporary_discourse_about_sociocultural_evolution.
4. Pearson Higher Education, “Anthropology and the
Study of Culture,” My Anthro Lab, Chapter
1, p. 17.
http://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/hip/us/hip_us_pearsonhighered/samplechapter/0205949509.pdf.
http://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/hip/us/hip_us_pearsonhighered/samplechapter/0205949509.pdf.
5. Alice Dreger, “When Taking Multiple Husbands Makes Sense,” The Atlantic, February 1, 2013. http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/02/when-taking-multiple-husbands-makes-sense/272726/.
6. “Piaget’s theory of cognitive development,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed
April 20, 2015. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piaget’s_theory_of_cognitive_development.
7. Plato, Crito,
Perseus Digital Library. Accessed April 20, 2015.
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0170%3Atext%3DCrito%3Apage%3D50
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0170%3Atext%3DCrito%3Apage%3D50
8. Mark J. Perry, “U.S. Male-Female SAT Math
Scores: What Accounts for the Gap?” Encyclopedia
Britannica blog, July 1, 2009. http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2009/07/more-on-the-male-female-sat-math-test-gap/
9.
Jenny Hope, “Women Doctors Will Soon Outnumber Men after Numbers in Medical
School Go up Tenfold,” Daily Mail online,
November 30, 2011. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2067887/Women-doctors-soon-outnumber-men-numbers-medical-school-fold.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.