When
it comes to our values, morés, and patterns of behaviour, we tend to change slowly
and grudgingly, but we can change. Thus, we could learn a mode of cultural
evolution that is vigorous but not militaristic.
Once we accept the view
that over generations, a maximally efficient cultural path, which values and mores steer us onto, exists in time itself, we
are admitting that values are real.
Thus, we must conclude that only certain values, those derived from our best
world view—that is, Science—will be rational choices to guide humanity to
greater health and vigor in the future. We all must live and survive in this
same physical universe.
The courage-wisdom meme complex, along with the
behaviour patterns it entails, is the human response to entropy; the
love-freedom meme complex is our long-term response to quantum uncertainty. The
optimal balance of them all is called virtue
or the Tao. It is always subtly
shifting its path. Especially in these nuclear-armed, climate-threatened times,
we must see those shifts and respond effectively. Or die.
Statue of Lao Tzu (credit: Wikimedia Commons)
The Tao Te Ching says: “The Tao that can be spoken
is not the Tao.” Lao Tsu was telling his disciples never to become confident
that they have life figured out and can now become complacent about their
capacity to handle life’s events; complacency is the harbinger of disaster. The
way of all ways, the Tao, is always evolving. To live - as individuals, but far
more importantly as nations—we must stay alert, resourceful, nimble, and sharp.
And values themselves? They are just our best
guides to where the survival path, through the present and on into the future,
lies.
Notes
1. “Convergent
Evolution,” Wikipedia, the Free
Encyclopedia. Accessed April 30, 2015. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution.
2. Richard Dawkins, “Selfish Genes and Selfish Memes,” in Douglas
R. Hofstadter and Daniel C. Dennett, The
Mind’s I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul (New York, NY: Basic
Books, 1981), pp. 123–144.
3. Alasdair MacIntyre, After
Virtue (London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013), p. 78.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.