Chapter 2. Part C
This
has been the scariest of the consequences of the rise of Science: moral
confusion and indecision among our elites. It began to become serious in the
West in the nineteenth century, but here we are in the twenty-first, and, if
anything, the crisis of moral confidence appears to be getting worse.
Now all
of this still may sound academic and far removed from the experience of
ordinary folk. But the truth is otherwise. When a society’s sages can't guide
the people, then the people look elsewhere for moral leadership. When the
“wise” respond to their fellow citizens’ queries about morality with jargon and
equivocation, others – some very “unwise” – jump in to fill the people’s needs.
So we
ask: how did the eroding of the moral systems of the West that followed the
rise of Science affect people living through real events? Let’s consider one
harsh example.
World War I
(photos from the Western Front)
By the early twentieth century, the impacts of the ideas
of Darwin and Freud, and of Science more generally, had arrived. Social
scientists and philosophers were left scrambling to understand what new moral
code, if any, was being implied for humanity by these new ways of seeing the
world. Answers on every side were contradictory and confusing. Then, following
too soon, in a bitter or perhaps inevitable irony, real world political events
broke out of control. 1914. World War I. A major test of the moral systems of
the new “scientific” societies of the West arrived.
World War I
recruitment poster
When World War I began, in the cities and
towns of Europe, and in the cities of all other countries that were attached
even remotely to the main belligerents, there were banners flying, troops
marching, bands playing, and huge crowds of men, women, and kids all shouting
for joy. A few sober people raised objections for one set of reasons or
another, but they were drowned out in the din. Finally, the superior armies and
ideals of “our way of life” were going to sweep aside the barbaric armies and
ideals of our nation’s enemies.
Exhorted in speeches by their leaders and by
writers in the media to stand up for their homelands, the men of Italy, Germany,
France, Britain, Austro-Hungary, and Russia, along with all of their allies,
accepted the jingoistic stories that were being told in their newspapers and
signed up to fight. Competing “narratives” about Europe and its history had finally
brought the European tribes into head-on confrontation.
Canadian World War I recruitment poster
German poster (depicting Britain as a global spider)
My country,
Canada, in 1914, was part of the British Empire, and Canadians were just as
gung-ho as any of the loyal subjects in London, England. Young men leapt out of
the crowds lining the streets to march in step with the parades of soldiers
going by. Many of them were worried that by the time they got through their
training and over to Europe, the fighting would be over. Girls clustered around
guys in uniform who came back to visit their workplaces or colleges or even
high schools before shipping out. Old ladies out shopping, by 1916, would spit
on any young man of military age who was not in uniform.
Long before the
horrible casualties began to mount, World War I was huge in the historians’
terms even from its very beginning because, for the first time in history,
modern, scientific weapons and technologies were going to be used to kill men
in assembly line ways. The whole process was going to be made as efficient as
the new, scientifically-designed factories: scientific technologies, arranged
in efficient sequences and supervised by experts. Now we would see what Science
could do.
We saw.
Consider just one telling statistic: the
British Army lost more casualties – 60,000 wounded, missing, and killed – in the
first six days of the Battle of the Somme than the British Army had lost in all
of its recorded history, all over the world, up until that week. France,
Russia, Germany, Austria, Italy, the U.S., and all of the others got hit with
similar experiences, over and over, for four long years.
In
the end, nine million combatants were dead, three times that many permanently
scarred. And those were just the combatants. How many civilians? No one really
knows. Every country on Earth was touched (or should we say "wrenched"?), either
directly or indirectly. Of the 600,000+ Canadians (from a population of eight
million) who went over to Europe to fight, one in nine died there. (65,000+)
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.