Chapter 11. (continued)
Under the Christian world view, the earth was the centre of the
universe, specially created by God to house man, his most beloved creation. But
man’s role was not to enjoy life as much as he could (as the ancients had) in
this garden turned, by human’s sin, to a barren plain. Humans were here to praise
God and gratefully accept all that God sent their way, all joy and all
suffering. Getting ready for the next life after death was what mattered. This
sounds like a backward step, and in many ways it was.
artist's conception of Good Samaritan helping injured stranger (Morot)
But Christianity added some useful ideas of its own. Christians were
taught to act humanely toward all other people, not just other Romans, to
behave honestly and compassionately in their dealings with others, and to
commit in a personal way to Christ’s kind of faith and his simple, honest, compassionate
way of life. Christians were programmed to live as if being kind to all was a
desirable, moral way to be, even if kind actions might not get any material rewards
for their doer in this lifetime.
This was a huge change from the ways of the slave-owning,
gladiator-loving, militaristic, sensual, mid-Empire Romans. Why the Church
later became so cynical as to conduct wars and own property while the
individual serf was not to even contemplate such things (unless the pope told him
to make war on the heathens) became vague. But the grip and the social utility of
Christianity’s good ideas was so strong that for centuries hypocritical
authorities found ways to steer ordinary followers’ thoughts and perceptions
past the Church’s inconsistencies.
For ten centuries, the Church’s explanations of the entirety of
the universe and human experience were enough to attract, build, and retain a
large following for the Church and the values and morés it endorsed. The
values, in turn, fostered communities that worked. In evolutionary terms, that was
all that mattered. Christian communities began to enjoy long periods of growing
prosperity because they were internally stable, even though by modern
standards, they were not very progressive. The chaos that had followed the fall
of the Roman Empire created conditions that taught everyone to long for mere order. Stability came to be seen as everything.
The behaviors these values produced had seemed effete to most of
the citizens of the middle Roman Empire. What was this “Chrestus”? What system
had he proposed that was stealing their children into its cult? The cross as
its symbol yet! The cross was a symbol for losers.
But that system, which gave legal status to all humans (even serfs
had rights), mutual support through all tribulations (mutual aid in war,
famine, and plague), and honesty in all dealings (God was watching!) proved
superior to the Roman one in the final test. Dissatisfied with what had become
the Roman way of life, a life filled with material comforts and pleasures but
devoid of ideals, more and more people became converts.
artist's conception of gladiators' combat in ancient Rome (Gerome)
Christianity offered something else—a worldview that felt personal
and a way of life that made sense to them because they believed it was what God
wanted of humans and, more importantly, over the long term, it fostered more efficient, more
inclusive communities. As contemptible as Christianity seemed to many of the
mid-Empire Romans, who cheered themselves hoarse as men killed each other in the arena, it nevertheless assimilated the old Roman system under which it had
risen. Its beliefs didn’t just sound nice; over millions of people and hundreds
of years, they worked.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.