Another digression is in order here. It is an
important digression that has been lingering at the edge of this topic, the
connection between culture and survival, for several chapters already, so I will
indulge in it for a few pages.
If we strive to be rigorously logical and objective
at this point, we can also become very discouraged. Every society has its own world
view, its own values, and its own morés (accepted patterns of behavior). The
natural trend for human societies seems to be for each to keep moving ahead
with its way of life while simultaneously diverging from and becoming ever more
alien to all other societies and their ways of life.
Does an analysis of human value systems imply also that
we can never arrive at a set of values that would be good and right for all
humans? Will the people in the world’s many different societies continue to be
loyal to incompatible sets of values? Even worse, will citizens of the world’s
societies continue to follow their own values so rigidly that they will
tolerate no other way and will feel motivated to kill other folk whose values
and behaviors clearly differ from their own? The answer in History, sadly,
seems to be “yes”.
Analyzing the background physical reality in which
societies evolve adds to our sense of hopelessness. The environment around us
is always changing, so our value systems and morés must too. When new
conditions arise, different societies’ responses to them may all prove
effective, as has happened in the animal world with lions and hyenas.
lions and hyenas fight over a kill (credit: Kruger Sightings, via Wikimedia Commons)
Lions and hyenas occupy the same habitat and hunt
the same prey. Their relative competitive advantages and disadvantages interact
in complex ways, but they both flourish at the same time in the same habitat.1
In this, they are akin to human societies, whose bases are cultural rather than
genetic, but whose competitive situations are analogous to those of lions and
hyenas. Lions and hyenas coexist in the same habitats and remain extremely
mutually hostile. They exist as hostile neighbours, drive one another away from
kills, and regularly fight to the death.
Examples of human societies in similar
circumstances don’t just riddle History; they are what History is about (e.g. the
Apache and Pueblo, Huron and Iroquois, Gauls and Germans, Ghiljais and Durranis,
Croats and Serbs, Poles and Ukrainians, Catholics and Protestants, Sunnis and Shia,
etc.).
In other words, estrangement between societies comes
about by a natural process. Different, often neighbouring societies, each with
its own values and customs, arise and make war on each other as naturally as
the real world simply rolls along. Such has been the case for all of human
history so far.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.