So, is war inevitable? Again, the evidence of
history seems to answer with a firm “yes”. Wars are fought over these very
differences. Following this line of argument, we see what Hitler thought of as
his great insight: he accepted that war was an inevitable, periodic test of the
cultural and, he said, racial vitality of a people. He held to, and ranted over,
his worldview to his last hour. To geneticists, his racial theories are
meaningless silliness. Humans are all one species. But when his worldview is
extended to an analysis of cultural groupings of humans (e.g. tribes and nations)
and the conflicts that arise among them, it becomes more disturbing.
Ruins of Nuremberg, Germany, 1945 (credit: Keystone/Second Roberts, via Wikimedia Commons)
The ancient Greeks had two words for humans: Hellenes (themselves) and barbarians (everyone else). Similar in
view and vocabulary are the Chinese. To many Chinese in China, I would be gwai lo, an evil alien. The word Masai—a famous African tribe’s name for
themselves—means people, as do the
words Innu, in Innu, and Cheyenne, in Cheyenne. For hundreds of
years, Europeans divided the members of the species homo sapiens into Christians and heathens. The Muslims speak of the
faithful and the infidel. All humans for centuries in Japan were either
Japanese or gaijin. Jews were proud that
they were not Gentiles. Tutsis were not Hutus. In other words, people in all
these cultures and most others that have ever existed have believed that they
are—or were, in the cases of those now vanished into history—the only fully human
humans. Thus, war has always occurred with discouraging regularity.
The evidence mounts on all sides against the hopes
of those who love peace. People find it easy, even moral, to attack, subdue,
assimilate, and sometimes even exterminate other humans whom they regard as
members of an inferior subspecies. By this reasoning, Hitler was only exhorting
the Germans to accept the inevitability of war and get to work at being
winners.
Under this reasoning, war is the way by which we
have – through the sociocultural mode of evolution – become our own predators.
We cut out the ineffective parts of our species’ total concepts-values-behaviors pool (its meme pool, rather than
its gene pool) by war. Wars primarily kill the young and fit, the prime
breeding stock. And modern wars kill much of the healthiest, smartest breeding
stock on both sides. Wars don’t serve a genetic mode of evolution anymore, if
they ever did. They clearly haven’t since the first technological war—that is, the
US Civil War. In modern wars, too many young men die and too much prime
breeding stock is lost. But wars do still serve a cultural mode of evolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.