Chapter 12. Part E
It is important to re-iterate here that
quantum theory is not talking about the macro level of variability, which is an
approximation that we are forced to by practical limits on our measuring
abilities when we are dealing with systems like the weather. Under that view,
one may still see the universe as a deterministic place. Instead, quantum
theory is saying that the processes going on at the sub-atomic level are always
popping in what appear - to us - to be uncaused
ways. What Einstein called "spooky action at a distance". (He loathed
the very idea of it.) But the point for my goal of trying to find a basis in
physical reality for a moral code is not affected by these distinctions.
Probability, as an overriding quality of reality, is ubiquitous and, as far as
we can tell presently, eternal. We must live with a probabilistic reality and adapt
to it as a fact of life.
Physicists are unclear about how or even
whether quantum uncertainty and non-quantum uncertainty interact and enhance
one another. The huge range of outcomes in complex systems may be influenced by
both non-quantum and quantum events. Currently, we just don't know. The exact
nature of what is going on down there is still being debated.
However, our moral models are not affected by
these distinctions. In the level of reality at which our choices are made and
our actions are measured, we experience reality as being made of events that
are probabilistic. And in those chains of events, informed, guided, chosen
human actions can effectively intervene and alter the likelihoods of at least some
outcomes. This is all that really matters for moral philosophy.
Therefore, in all that follows, I will speak
of the probabilistic quality of nature as being one of the crucial and basic
characteristics that we humans must deal with. When I speak of "quantum
uncertainty", I will be referring to the total uncertainty of reality that
human beings have to learn to accommodate and react effectively to.
Charles S. Peirce
Quantum theory breaks the backbone of
classical determinism. At the tiniest level that we have so far been able to
study, events are not connected by single paths of direct cause and effect.
They are connected by forces that do not obey exact laws of cause and effect,
but instead can only be described by laws of probability. The consequence for
humans at the human level is that life is full of uncertainty, or to be exact,
probabilities. Reality is a stochastic system. Most of the time we know with a
high degree of probability what is going to happen next, and we also know, with
a fair degree of reliability, how we may be able to influence what is going to
happen next; but we never know for certain what is going to happen with
anything. This view was anticipated by the American philosopher, Peirce, in the
1890's and has been further developed by many thinkers right into the
twenty-first century. (4.) (5.)
We can act, and we do act, in bold, informed,
calculated, and skilful ways, and our actions alter the probabilities of the
various events that may happen in the next few seconds or
decades, but it is also true that we can't ever act so intelligently or
skillfully that we can be one hundred percent sure of any outcome, good or bad.
The elements of surprise and risk are built into reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.