Chapter 14. Part D
Similarly, courage and wisdom are considered
to be values everywhere. These values are so familiar as to be seen by almost
all of the people in the world today to be perquisites of the human condition,
but they aren't that automatic at all. There is nothing in the genes of the
human animal that would make one predict these values occurring in societies
everywhere, as naturally as walking on two feet. Bipedal motion arises almost
automatically out of our genetic design. Respecting elders doesn't. Certain
values are found in societies all over the world because they work. They enable
a human society to survive and flourish. That is convergence in social
evolution. Other concepts in the biological sciences also apply in analogous
ways, as we should expect.
graphic illustration of the fitness landscape concept
One
of the subtlest is modeled in what evolutionary biologists call a “fitness
landscape”, which is the model from which the concept of convergence derives.
(1.) If we imagine drawing a graph which shows how two genetic traits, say size
and coloring, interact to give a size-color survival index for a given species
in a given environment, we then can find on the graph the place where the
coloring and the size combine to give the optimal survival chances for that
species in that environment. Next we can imagine plotting a similar graph but
in three dimensions, with an x axis, a y axis, and a z axis as we learned to do
in high school Math class. The picture that would result in three dimensions
would show a theoretical "landscape" with ridges and peaks and
valleys. The “peaks” indicate where the best combination of coloring, size, and,
let's say, coat density lie for that species' survival in the environment for
which we have drawn the three dimensional graph.
Geneticists speak of fitness landscapes of
ten, fifty, and two hundred dimensions as if what they are talking about is totally
clear. No graph of any such landscape could be pictured by the human mind, of
course, but with the mathematical models that we have now, and with computers
to do the calculations, geneticists can usually predict what niches in an
emerging environment will contain which kinds of species and in how long.
The concept of a fitness landscape – which is
not a real landscape, remember, since it only exists in imaginary, mathematical
space – can then be applied to the combinations of memes in human cultures,
combinations that produce morés and patterns of behavior in the real people
living real lives. The concept of a meme – a basic unit of human thinking – is
a tenuous one, and it is still considered by some social scientists to be
unproven and of uncertain value. (see Dawkins' "Selfish Genes and Selfish
Memes" in "The Mind's I" for a basic explanation of the meme
concept.) (2.) But for now, if we take it as a given and move on with it, the
results of the thinking that the meme concept enables support what this book is
trying to show.
We can construct, in imaginary, mathematical
space, a fitness landscape for memes, or in other words, for unit-ideas that
humans use to build up systems of beliefs about what the universe is made of,
what forces and fields give direction to the movements of the things in it - including
us, the thinking things - and what we can and should be doing in this mix. That
fitness landscape, that multi-dimensional graph of human thought patterns, will
be very similar for all individuals in a given culture. What I mean by
"red" and "round" and "sweet" and
"tangy" is pretty close to what other English speakers mean by these
terms. So is what I mean by the term "apple" or “plum”. My idea of
beauty roughly coincides with that of other Canadians' ideas of beauty. Even
how we think of terms like "good", "wise" and
"democracy" largely coincide. They enable us to communicate
effectively most of the time. I am a son of my culture.
Useful concepts – i.e. meme combinations that
correspond to peaks on the fitness landscape – are "found" by the
people in a culture over generations of that culture's evolution because
through trial and error, the concepts prove effective. They enable people in
that culture who are capable of thinking with them, and then using them to
design behavior patterns, to survive and flourish. They are almost never the
only combinations of ideas or behavior patterns that could work in that
environment. Other people of other cultures with other similar, but not
identical morés, could survive there. Human societies are very capable and
versatile, as are the various species in a living ecosystem.
stilts
fishermen (Sri Lanka)
spearfishing
(Hawaii)
Innu woman ice-fishing
(Canada)
Yawalapiti bow-fishing (Brazil)
But the point to see is that whichever
culture-society-tribe settles down there, it will come to think with memes,
concepts, values, and morés that can be formed into combinations that enable
them to achieve the requirements of survival. People can learn to fish with
hooks or nets or spears or gaffs or baskets, depending on what materials are
available in the region and what kinds of technical models are already familiar
to the people of the given culture. But the chances are very good that if there
are lots of fish in a body of water, then any tribe that settles down next to it will
learn, by one method or another, to fish.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts now? Comment and I will reply. I promise.